evince such symptoms of terminalnscientism. A Belgian biophysicistnrecognizes that it isn"dangerous" for anyone to benconsidered "more competent tonjudge today's society" simply becausenof scientific acumen, andnhe firmly disagrees with hisnskeptical interviewer's dismissalnof religion as "irrationality,"naverring that "religion is a perfectlynrational system once onengrants its premises." Similarly, annAmerican . . .