dicker wasn't in trouble yet, DeWaldntold him, but he would be if he plantedna cereal crop on the land, which wouldnbe a violation of the "Swampbuster"nact. According to DeWald, the localnconservationist also talked to Widicker,nreiterating that grass seed on the convertednwetland would be okay, but thatneven a . . .
By The Archive
Leave a Reply