in for seating. As The Economist describednthe effect, it was "more a gi^enthan a gig." This travesty of Balanchine'snchoreography was part of a celebrationnof the Italian Communist Party's/estondeH'unitanIt's too bad Balanchine couldn't havenbeen there to see it. Before his defectionnin 1924, he had . . .
By The Archive
Leave a Reply