For several years now, the Democratic Party and its allies in the media have been fomenting violence. Since they control the mainstream news cycle, they’ve been able to get away with their mischief—bigly. One must be a low-grade moron, a fanatical Democratic partisan, or a seeing- and hearing-impaired hermit not to notice what’s been transpiring. From 2020’s so-called Summer of Love, through the intimidation of Supreme Court justices who supposedly voted “against women” in the Dobbs decision of 2022, to the incitement to assassinate Donald Trump in 2024, to the recent torching of Tesla automobiles and dealerships, the Democrats have been as much steeped in violence as the Nazis and Communists were during the waning days of the Weimar Republic.

Senator Chuck Schumer’s threat of “reaping the whirlwind,” hurled on the steps of the Supreme Court at the justices who sided with reversing Roe v. Wade against the wishes of the Democratic Party, was no idle gesture. Those justices were targeted in their homes and  menacingly demonstrated against, while Justice Kavanaugh was the object of an assassination plot by someone angered by his stand on abortion. If anyone is disappointed by how supposedly conservative justices have begun to vote with the left, the explanation might be that these vulnerable judges are understandably afraid that Democratic mobs and assailants may come after them and their families. Given their unsettling recent experiences, these judges have every reason to fear this.

Democratic operatives and their media allies are not looking in the mouths of the unhinged gift horses they’ve created. The Democrats learned, after the 2020 riots they helped abet, how much partisan violence they can get away with stirring up. While the staff of Kamala Harris and other prominent Democrats were bailing out the arsonists who burned Minneapolis during the George Floyd riots, enabling them to return to their criminal activities, the media provided cover for the party they slobber over. News interpreters went apoplectic attacking Trump’s policy of calling out the National Guard during those riots, and they focused their feigned anger on Kyle Rittenhouse, the young man in Kenosha, Wisconsin, who shot and killed assailants who were chasing him during another riot inspired by a police shooting.

This week, a bomb was thrown into the Tesla vehicle of a pregnant women in Vancouver. It seems the anti-Trump fanatics now targeting Musk are finding allies among our very woke neighbors to the North. One point about the violence spreading in Canada seems indisputable: those involved are most definitely not Conservatives. They and their compatriots engaged in similar activity here in the U.S. are quite likely enthusiasts of left-wing politics and, in many cases, are being paid for their efforts by George Soros’s NGOs or other front organizations. It is hard to imagine that those torching Tesla dealerships and leaving messages with the word “resist” are doing anything that doesn’t delight the U.S. Democratic Party leadership.

Among those who bear a heavy responsibility for this unceasing violence are Democratic voters, 77 million of whom voted for Kamala Harris last November. These constituents try hard not to notice the churlish behavior of their party and some are willing to justify it. The Democratic strategist Mark Penn was one of a few who expressed strong disapproval about how the leaders of his party have used “the demonization of Trump,” and the likening of him and his voters to Nazis, to keep together their constituency. That this rhetoric has stoked violent behavior seems highly likely. Why wouldn’t people who have been told night and day that Nazism is the worst thing that ever happened react violently against what they believe is its American manifestation? The leftist orientation of Democrats would make them even more gullible than other Americans to their party propagandists telling them about rampant Nazism in the MAGA movement.

Even more important is the role of the public sector and NGO employees who benefit from misspent public largess. This is a major demographic in the U.S. and in other Western countries, and these multitudinous swamp creatures are fighting back against the efforts of Trump and Elon Musk to trim their budgets and dismiss these superfluous or dishonest “public servants.” Trump is plainly going after powerful social and financial interests; his adversaries enjoy the near total support of the media throughout the West as they lash out in noisy demonstrations against a threat to both their power and resources.

The historical parallel that comes to mind here is the Fronde, the uprising that the entrenched French aristocracy waged against the Bourbon dynasty in the middle of the 17^th century. That civil war, which lasted several years, took place as the royal government opened remunerative political positions to non-aristocrats. The nobility reacted violently to this threat to their sinecures and other privileges while threatening the life of the young king Louis XIV.

But I won’t overdo my attempt to look for precedents for current events. The 17^th -century French aristocracy were socially the crème de la crème in comparison to our overbearing public parasites. Moreover, unlike our public sector, these noblemen never funded the teaching of LGBTQ ideology on distant continents with public money.